On-chain evidence collection requires chain-of-custody documentation, hash-verified data, and CPR Part 35 compliance. Here are the standards courts require.

ERC-20 token flow analysis traces custom tokens through smart contract transfer events and approval records for fraud investigation.

Crypto asset freezing injunctions are court orders that prevent a defendant from dissipating, transferring, or hiding digital assets pending litigation or enforcement.

MEV bot transaction patterns reveal front-running and sandwich attacks through mempool timing, gas escalation, and profit wallet clustering on Ethereum.

On-chain analysis without enterprise tools refers to blockchain investigation using open-source software, public blockchain explorers, and free-tier APIs rather than commercial platforms such as Chainalysis Reactor or Elliptic Forensics.

Flash loan attack analysis reconstructs DeFi exploits by tracing borrowed funds through manipulation sequences to identify attacker wallets.

Presenting on-chain evidence in court requires expert witnesses to translate technically complex blockchain data into clear, defensible findings that can be understood and relied upon by judges and juries without specialist technical knowledge.

Wrapped token forensics traces WBTC and bridge-wrapped assets across chains by linking minting and burning events to the original wallet owners.

Last updated: March 2026 What UK courts require from cryptocurrency tracing reports is a set of evidentiary and procedural standards that determine whether blockchain forensic evidence will be admitted, relied upon, and survive cross-examination. The requirements draw from CPR...

Sidechain transaction analysis traces Bitcoin through Liquid Network and RSK via peg-in and peg-out events to identify wallet owners.